principal coverage with out preliminary fee not in drive

A Missouri appeals court docket yesterday affirmed a decrease court docket ruling denying life insurance coverage demise advantages to the widow of a dentist who died earlier than paying his preliminary premium.

On April 26, 2019, Dr. Robert P. Rothenberg, of Ballwin, Ms., signed paperwork within the workplace of his insurance coverage dealer, Robert W. Bagby, on a $250,000 time period life coverage with Principal Nationwide Life Insurance coverage Co., based on court docket paperwork.

Rothenberg suffered a deadly coronary heart assault later that day.

Rothenberg meant to make a lump sum fee for his annual premium by way of his and spouse Donna’s joint checking account. An Digital Funds Switch type was included within the paperwork at Bagby’s workplace, however Rothenberg didn’t fill it out, court docket paperwork say.

“Bagby known as Rob that afternoon and knowledgeable him {that a} voided test was required to finish the paperwork,” notes the enchantment determination by Decide Bobby Shepherd. “Bagby allegedly instructed Rob that the Coverage wouldn’t be in drive till the primary premium was paid.”

After Rothenberg’s demise, Bagby knowledgeable Donna Rothenberg of the lacking banking data, court docket paperwork say. Donna Rothenberg then despatched a voided test to Bagby, who in flip offered it to Principal.

She subsequently submitted a declare to Principal, contending that the coverage had turn out to be efficient on April 26, 2019, and that the $250,000 demise profit was payable to her. Principal denied the declare.

Dr. Rothenberg had been lined for a few years by a Jackson Nationwide Life Insurance coverage Co. coverage, court docket paperwork say. Rothenberg elected to let that coverage lapse simply 12 days earlier than his demise as a result of “the coverage’s premium would considerably enhance upon renewal,” court docket paperwork say.

Coverage not in drive

Principal filed a lawsuit on August 16, 2019, in the USA District Court docket for the Jap District of Missouri, looking for a declaration that the coverage had by no means turn out to be efficient and that Donna Rothenberg was not entitled to the demise advantages.

Rothenberg filed a counterclaim in opposition to Principal for breach of contract and vexatious denial of proceeds below Missouri legislation. She additionally sued Bagby for 2 counts of negligence: one in his capability because the couple’s insurance coverage dealer and one for his function because the couple’s monetary planner.

The district court docket dominated in favor of Principal and Bagby. A 3-judge appeals court docket panel discovered no purpose to overturn that call, Shepherd wrote.

“Rob elected to forgo paying an advance premium on his software, which meant that the Coverage wouldn’t be efficient till he had paid his first premium,” he wrote. “Wishing to pay the premium by way of his and Donna’s joint checking account, he utilized the EFT Kind however didn’t enter his banking data. The absence of this data prevented Principal from withdrawing funds. As a result of the preliminary premium was not paid on the time of Rob’s demise on April 26, 2019, the Coverage’s unambiguous language dictates that it was not in impact and, thus, Principal was not accountable for protection.”

InsuranceNewsNet Senior Editor John Hilton lined enterprise and different beats in additional than 20 years of day by day journalism. John could also be reached at [email protected]. Comply with him on Twitter @INNJohnH.

© Whole contents copyright 2023 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No a part of this text could also be reprinted with out the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.