Aviva chief requires extension of cap on fire-safety prices to England’s low-rises

Obtain free Grenfell Tower catastrophe updates

We’ll ship you a myFT Every day Digest electronic mail rounding up the newest Grenfell Tower catastrophe information each morning.

The top of one of many UK’s largest insurers has known as on ministers to increase measures capping how a lot residents in tower blocks must pay for post-Grenfell fire-safety works to these in low-rise flats.

Six years on from the Grenfell fireplace, 1000’s of leaseholders in blocks of flats beneath 11 metres in England are dealing with massive payments to switch cladding and make different fire-safety modifications. They had been excluded from the cap after the federal government deemed the buildings at decrease danger from fireplace.

Amanda Blanc, chief government at FTSE 100 insurer Aviva, informed the Monetary Occasions that the federal government ought to “undoubtedly” think about bringing lower-level condo buildings throughout the scope of the cap, including that the 11m rule “does really feel barely arbitrary”.

“This space has been very difficult and it has taken too lengthy to get to an answer,” Blanc added. “Within the meantime, you’ve gotten had leaseholders in very troublesome conditions. What we’d do is to encourage actual readability across the guidelines, as a result of I believe in the mean time, that’s missing.”

Her feedback echo latest criticism by MPs and campaigners who highlighted the plight of 1000’s of leaseholders in low rises having to pay for the modifications themselves.

Campaigners mentioned that in some circumstances residents had been pressured to select up these prices as a result of the block failed a fireplace security evaluation however in others, it was insurers who made cowl contingent on remedial work being carried out.

Furthermore, freeholders are allowed to move constructing prices on to leaseholders, leading to a lot of latest court docket rulings rejecting makes an attempt to make landlords share within the cladding invoice.

This month, the FT highlighted a case involving residents at Woodchester Court docket and Hitcham Court docket in Chipping Barnet, who needed to pay to take away cladding final 12 months at a price of £10,000 per flat. One of many leaseholders mentioned the insurance coverage dealer appearing for the block knowledgeable the residents that Aviva would cowl the constructing provided that the cladding was eliminated.

On the time the insurer declined to touch upon particular circumstances. Blanc mentioned it had not pressured residents in blocks beneath 11m to hold out remedial work to get protection.

“We do not make it harder for leaseholders in these buildings,” she mentioned, including that the group was underwriting 10,000 new leaseholders after opening up its commonplace property insurance coverage coverage to clients with flamable cladding two years in the past.

The British Insurance coverage Brokers’ Affiliation commerce physique backed Blanc’s name for a evaluate of the cap. It urged the federal government to “think about a discount within the 11m restrict as any fireplace declare brought on by harmful cladding poses a danger to life, a severe loss for the proprietor and the leaseholders and typically a big price to the insurer”.

The Affiliation of British Insurers mentioned that an evaluation of fireside danger “ought to have a look at the use and development of the constructing and never be constrained to arbitrary top limits”.

In response, the federal government mentioned it could examine any circumstances the place landlords had been proposing pricey constructing remediation work for sub-11m buildings.

“Within the uncommon circumstances the place work is critical in buildings beneath 11m, we anticipate freeholders to hunt to get better prices from these chargeable for constructing unsafe houses, and never from harmless leaseholders,” it added.